Know where your admissions function sits. In twenty minutes.
A free tool for higher education providers who want a quick, honest read on where their admissions function sits against current regulatory and practice expectations.
Around forty questions, structured across the five domains Think Bold uses in the full Diagnostic Review: regulatory compliance, policy and governance, process and operations, team capability, and applicant experience. At the end, you get a snapshot showing where you’re strong, where the risks sit, and what’s worth prioritising.
Twenty minutes. No commitment.
What you’ll get
- A structured self-assessment covering five domains and around forty questions
- A scored snapshot of your function against current good practice
- A flag on the highest-priority areas to investigate
- A summary you can share with senior leadership or governance colleagues
Who it’s for
Higher education providers who want:
- An informed view of their admissions function without commissioning a review
- A starting point before deciding whether to invest in deeper diagnostic work
- A baseline to revisit annually as their function changes
- Something credible to take into committee, governance, or a leadership conversation
Get the self-assessment
[Form: Name (required), Email (required), Institution (optional), Role (optional)]
[Button: Send me the self-assessment]
You’ll receive the self-assessment immediately by email, alongside occasional sector commentary from Think Bold. Your details are handled in line with our Privacy Notice. Unsubscribe at any time.
Going deeper
The self-assessment is a snapshot, not a review. It surfaces where to look. It can’t tell you exactly what to do.
For institutions that want a deeper view of their function, the Admissions Diagnostic Review is the right next step. Particularly useful where the self-assessment flags significant concerns or where governance, regulator, or leadership conversations require external scrutiny.